How should you convince administration that a former nutrition program should be reinstated?

Demonstrating that 75% of those who attended the former nutrition program experienced fewer hospital stays effectively supports the case for reinstating the program. This data point is significant because it directly ties the program's effectiveness to measurable health outcomes, which is a crucial factor for administration. Reducing hospital stays signifies not only improved patient health but potentially lower healthcare costs, which is a compelling argument for decision-makers focused on resource allocation and financial efficiency.

The other options, while they provide useful insights into participant satisfaction and attendance, do not present as strong a case. The percentage of patients who enjoyed the program indicates satisfaction but doesn’t directly correlate with health outcomes. Attendance figures are also informative; however, they do not reveal whether attendance actually led to better health results. Finally, knowing that only 10% felt the program was not worthwhile could suggest a level of acceptance, but again, this does not provide tangible evidence of improved patient health or cost-effectiveness as the data on hospital stays does. Therefore, focusing on outcomes that directly affect patient well-being and healthcare efficiency is the most persuasive approach.